D&C 101:76-80
101:76-80 - The Lord goes into some pretty specific stuff
about how the Saints should go about solving their problems, and the origin of
the United States constitution. I’m not sure what the saints were expecting, vengeance
or permission to fight, maybe like the Jews at the time of Christ, they wanted
a warrior god to free them from their oppression but like the Jews, the Lord
tells them to be patient, to endure, to perfect themselves in their
tribulations. This is similar to Alma and Amulon, Limhi and his people, they
weren’t delivered right away, it took time, they were told to wait and so they
did, kicking and screaming much of the time. Here the Lord tells them to “importune
for redress, and redemption, by the hands of those who are placed as rulers and
are in authority over you.” The IM teaches, “One purpose of government is to
protect individuals ‘in their inherent and inalienable rights,’ including ‘the
free exercise of conscience, the right and control of property, and the
protection of life.’ The Saints in Zion were denied all these rights. The
Constitution of United States guarantees individuals the right to apply from
redress when denied their rights. The Lord urged the Saints in Zion ‘to
importune for redress, and redemption’ at the hands of the constituted
authorities. President Charles W. Penrose explained how the Constitution
benefits all people: ‘In section 101 the Lord speaks about the constitution of
this land. He says it was framed by wise men whom he raised up for that very
purpose. What for? To maintain the rights and privileges ‘of all flesh.’ Now only
the people of this land. The principle of that great instrument are to go forth
to the nations, and the time will come when they will prevail, just as sure as
the sun shines even when it appears to be in darkness and the clouds are over
it.’” And I guess it’s true, the constitution of our country have influenced
the constitutions of other governments. The next several verses are thick with
language that I’m kind of struggling with right now, but basically the Lord is
saying that the constitution was established by God to protect the rights of
all people so that they could act for themselves “according to the moral agency
which I have given unto him, that every man may be accountable for his own sins
in the day of judgment.” This brings to mind when the Lehi said to Laman and
Lemuel that they will be responsible for the sins of their children because
they refused to teach them the gospel, or when King Mosiah convinced the people
that they needed elected judges instead of kings because a wicked king
influences his people to be wicked themselves, and therefore he is responsible
for much of their wickedness as well. But in a democratic government where
people are free to make their own choices, then the government isn’t to blame
to people’s poor choices, but as the Lord stipulates this is “according to just
and holy principles.” Excellent insight into the creation of the United States
in verse 80 in which the Lord says “And for this purpose have I established the
Constitution of this land, by the hands of wise men whom I raised up unto this
very purpose, and redeemed the land by the shedding of blood.” The IM says, “To
me… that statement of the lord, ‘I have established the Constitution of this
land, puts the Constitution of the United States in the position in which it
would be if it were written in the book of Doctrine and Covenants itself. This
makes the Constitution the world of the Lord to us. That it was given, not by
oral utterance, but by the operation of his mind and spirit upon the minds of
men, inspiring them to the working out of this great document of human government,
does not alter its authority.” Looking at it from this perspective, makes
amending the constitution that much more serious. The taking of this nation by
bloodshed is a pretty serious matter coming from the Prince of Peace, and
knowing that the founders were inspired and chosen for this very purpose is
incredible. Once I was at a book store and I picked up a book called Being
George Washington and the back of the book read as follows, referring to George
Washington as the “colonel” it says: “As he stared into the fire, the colonel
took off his coat. Shaking it out, he found two holes, the shells having passed
right through the fabric. He stared at them in disbelief, pushing a finger
through each hole as if to convince himself that they were real. He slowly
shook his head in disbelief. A small group of officers was watching. One of
them, a scrawny Virginia with jet-black hair, leaned forward on his knees, his
face pale yellow in the firelight. ‘There’s another one in your hat, sit.’ The
colonel took his hat off and examined it. Yes, there was another hole. Two
shells through his clothes. Another through his hat. Two horses shot out from
underneath him. He shook his head again. A fellow Virginian officer watched him
carefully. ‘Who are you?’ the man wondered aloud, a deep hesitation in his
voice… The colonel looked his fellow Virginian in the eyes. ‘I am George
Washington.’” I got goose bumps reading that, it was so incredible, another
example of how God can protect in ways that make no sense to us. The IM quotes
President Brigham Young as saying, “We believe that the Lord has been preparing
that when he should bring forth his work, that, when the set time should fully
come, there might be a place upon his footstool where sufficient liberty of
conscience should exist, that his Satins might dwell in peace under the broad
panoply of constitutional law and equal rights. In this view we might consider
that the men in the Revolution were inspired by the Almighty, to throw off the
shackles of the mother government, with her established religion. For this
cause were Adams, Jefferson, Franklin, Washington, and a host of others
inspired to deeds of resistance to the acts of the King of Great Britain, who
might also have been led to those aggressive acts, for aught we know, to bring
to pass the purposes of God, in this establishing a new government upon a
principle of greater freedom, a basis of self-government allowing the free
exercise of religious worship. It was the voice of the Lord inspiring all those
worthy men who bore influence in those trying times, not only to go forth in
battle but to exercise wisdom in council, fortitude, courage, and endurance in
the tented field, as well as subsequently to form and adopt those wise and
efficient measures which secured to themselves and succeeding generations, the
blessings of a free and independent government.”
101:80-95 - The Lord gives another parable in which he
demonstrates the Saints need to continue to seek redress from the government,
and it’s really an interesting point He’s making here, it’s kind of “the
squeaky wheel gets the grease,” situation. The parable is about a woman who
went a an unjust judge and asked for redress and he refused because he “feared
not God, neither regarded man.” But she kept coming and coming to him so much
that he eventually got tired of her and said “though I fear not God, nor regard
man, yet because this widow troubleth me
I will avenge her, lest by her continual coming she weary me.” The Lord tells
the Saints to “importune at the feet of the governor” and if that doesn’t work
then the president, and if that doesn’t work then the Lord will “come forth out
of his hiding place, and in his fury vex the nation.” I find it interesting
that he never tells them “do this and it will work,” he tells them “try this
and if it doesn’t work, then try that.” He tells them his end game but never
the route to take. A lot of people can look at that and say “Joseph Smith was
guessing, that’s why,” but that doesn’t seem to be the case because every time
the saints try what the Lord has commanded, even if it doesn’t get them the
results that they want, they learned a valuable lesson needed for later, or
strengthened a part of themselves that couldn’t be done any other way. It’s
interesting to look at that model in our own lives because how often are we
given an answer to our prayers and then are disappointed when it doesn’t work
out the way that we want it to? The IM say, “the Lord repeated the parable in
Luke 18:1-8 of the woman who so wearied a judge with her importuning that he
finally granted her petition. He then likened the parable to the situation of
the Saints. They were to seek redress from the judge through the governor to
the president of the United States himself. If the appeals went unheeded, the
Lord said that he would rise in anger and mete out justice to those who had
dispossessed the Saints, for all men would ‘be left without excuse.’ President
Joseph Fielding Smith explained: ‘The saints were also to carry their
grievances to the proper tribunals and seek for redress of their wrongs. This
was a very necessary step, and when the Saints did this and were denied their
civil and religious rights, those officials were left without excuse, and the
judgments of the Almighty which later came upon them during the Civil War, were
justified… Since there is a just law of retribution, as fixed and eternal as
are other laws of the Almighty, the day must come when there shall be
adjustments made before a Just Magistrate who will not be cowed by the threats
of mobs.’” Even though the Lord knows that they won’t respond favorably, it’s
important to the process for them to be given the chance to do so. With that
logic, we could be punished for things we haven’t done yet just because the
Lord knows that we will. Agency dictates that we have the opportunity to choose
to be obedient or to be disobedient before any consequences are rendered, that
only makes sense. But we are counseled to “pray ye, therefore, that their ears
may be opened unto your cries, that I may be merciful unto them, that these
things may not come upon them.” That’s an interesting perspective, pray for
them to be just so that not only will you be taken care of but they won’t have
to be punished.
101:96-101 – The Lord’s last counsel to the saints in this
revelation is for them to hang on to the land and the properties that they
bought, “therefore, it is my will that my people should claim, and hold claim
upon that which I have appointed unto them, though they should not be permitted
to swell thereon.” The IM says “the saints were commanded to ‘hold claim’ upon
their Missouri lands even ‘though they should not be permitted to dwell
thereon.’ In writing to the Saints in Jackson County, the Prophet Joseph Smith
said: ‘I would inform you that it is not the will of the Lord for you to sell
your lands in Zion, if means can possibly be procured for your sustenance without.
Every exertion should be made to maintain the cause you have espoused.’ He then
went on to say: ‘Let your sufferings be what they may, it is better in the eyes
of God that you should die, than that you should give up the land of Zion, the
inheritanes which you have purchased with your moneys; for every man that
giventh not up his inheritance, though he should die, yet, when the lord shall
come, he shall stand upon it, and with Job, in his flesh he shall see God.
Therefore, this is my counsel, that you retain your lands, even unto the
uttermost, and employ every lawful means to seek redress of your enemies; and
pray to God, day and night, to return you in peace and in safety to the lands
of your inheritance: and when the judge fail you, appeal unto the executive;
and when the executive fail you, and the humanity of the people fail you, and
all things else fail you but God alone, and you continue to weary Him with your
importunings, as the poor woman did the unjust judge, He will not fail to
execute judgment upon your enemies, and to avenge His own elect that cry unto
Him day and night.’ The consecrated lands of the Saints’ inheritances were
polluted by the wicked mobs as they burned and pillaged. But for the Saints to
consent to this pollution by selling their lands was, in the eyes of the Lord, ‘a
very sore and grievous sin.’”
Comments
Post a Comment