John the Baptist Goes to Prison
John the Baptist has shown remarkable humility and reverence
toward Jesus and their respective roles in the kingdom, but true to his words
that he must decrease while the Lord increases, John is arrested and imprisoned
by Herod the tetrarch. Matthew and Mark both only comment that Jesus left for
Galilee after John was put into prison but Luke gives a more detailed account
of what happened, saying, “But Herod the Tetrarch, being reproved by him for
Herodias his brother Philip’s wife, and for all the evils which Herod had done,
added yet this above all, that he shut up John in prison.” JTC gives us some
insight on the timeline and purpose behind John’s imprisonment saying, “Even
before Jesus had returned to Galilee after His baptism and the forty days of
solitude in the wilderness, John the Baptist was imprisoned by order of Herod
Antipus, tetrarch of Galilee and Perea… The tetrarch had some regard for John,
having found him to be a holy man; and many things had Herod done on the direct
advice of the Baptist or because of the influence of the latter’s general
teaching. Indeed, Herod had listened to John gladly, and had imprisoned him
through a reluctant yielding to the importunities of Herodias, whom Herod
claimed as a wife under cover of an illegal marriage. Herodias had been and
legally was still the wife of Herod’s brother Philip, from whom she had never
been lawfully divorced; and her pretended marriage to Herod Antipus was both
adulterous and incestuous under Jewish law. The Baptist had fearlessly
denounced this sinful association; to Herod he had said: ‘It is not lawful for
thee to have thy brother’s wife.’ Though Herod might possibly have ignored this
stern rebuke, or at least might have allowed it to pass without punishment,
Herodias would not condone. It was she, not the tetrarch, who most hated John;
she ‘had a quarrel against him,’ and succeeded in inducing Herod to have the Baptist
seized and incarcerated as a step toward the consummation of her vengeful plan
of having him put to death.”
There are a few points that I find interesting about this
whole thing. First is that a man doesn’t just come and take his brother’s wife,
especially when you consider that both Herod and Philip were Roman Rulers, that
would have made a mess of the kingdom and perhaps wars against each other,
because there is a large issue of pride here. Any kind of disturbance like that
would have come to the attention of the emperor and even Roman rulers were
afraid of displeasing the emperor. The second point is that Herodias sure
seemed invested in making sure that she stayed Herod’s wife, so much so that
she threw a fit against John until Herod gave in and had him arrested. A woman
who was taken against her will from one man to another, might not act so
enraged at the condemnation of their “marriage” because she condemns it as
well, she just can’t say anything. The people fight for what they want and she
wanted to be married to Herod, for whatever reason, and she fought against
anyone trying to take it away from her.
It’s time for speculation on my part. The power or authority
of Herod and Philip couldn’t have been equal, because if they were, Philip
would have felt he had the ability to fight his brother for his wife. I’m going
to take love out of the whole equation because when you get this high in power
and act so cruelly, your motives usually aren’t based on love. Philip would
have fought to keep Herodias just for the sake of his pride, it’s embarrassing
to have your brother come and take your wife. Philip would have fought to keep
Herodias as a power play against his brother, so show that he’s just as strong
and powerful as he is. Philip would have fought to keep Herodias as a power
play against her, putting his woman in her place. I’m not saying that any of
these are right, but this is what I know human nature, especially male nature,
to be. Any of these reasons would have been enough for Philip to fight for his
wife, and like I said, it couldn’t have been that big of a fight though because
of the repercussions from the emperor. So I think this whole transaction went
down without that much fanfare because any fight would have brought problems to
that area from Rome. This indicates to me that Philip was the less powerful
ruler. Another indication of this is how adamant Herodias was that she stay
with Herod. There was some very powerful reason that she desired to be Herod’s
wife and not Philip’s, indicating again that Herod was the more powerful ruler.
That whole situation is a mess.
John’s boldness in speaking out against Herod’s “marriage”
to Herodias was incredibly brave, as Herod Antipus could be just as cruel as
his father, the one who slaughtered all those babies to kill the Messiah. Roman
rulers were exceptionally horrific, surely John knew the consequences when he
spoke out, and sure enough, he went to prison for it. I can’t imagine much
worse than an ancient roman prison, how terrible. And there John sits for 9-24
months, but he still accomplishes much from prison, as we will see later.
Jesus was also apparently upset by John’s imprisonment as he
left for Galilee right after John’s arrest, as Matthew and Mark seem to imply.
Matthew tells us “and leaving Nazareth, he came and dwelt in Capernum, which is
upon the sea coast, in the borders of Zabulon and Nephthalim: that it might be
fulfilled which was spoken by Esaias the prophet saying, The land of Zabulon,
and the land of Nephthalim, by the way of the sea, beyond Jordan, Galilee of
the Gentiles; the people which sat in darkness saw great light; and to them
which say in the region and shadow of death light is sprung up.” I didn’t even
think twice about this but the IM gives some really interesting insight into
what this means saying, “In Matthew 4:13-16, Matthew was referring to Isaiah
9:1-2. Jesus Christ spent the majority of His life and ministry in the villages
of Galilee- places like Capernum, Nain, Nazzreth, and Bethsaida. During Old Testament
times this area was the inheritance of the tribes of Zebulon and Naphtali. Over
the centuries, numerous battles were waged to secure control over this
strategic region. Some have suggested that because so many people lost their
lives in battle here, Isaiah referred to the people of this region as ‘them
which say in the region and shadow of death.’ Isaiah prophesied that in this
death-stricken land a ‘great light’ would spring up. That light is Jesus Christ,
the Light of the World. Matthew wanted his readers to know that the Savior’s
ministry in the land of Galilee was a fulfillment of this messianic prophecy.”
Comments
Post a Comment